Introduction
The recent boycott of an Anganwadi centre in Odisha following the appointment of a Scheduled Caste woman (SC) as helper-cum-cook raises questions that extend beyond one village, one institution, or one appointment. The resistance came from sections of the local Scheduled Tribe (ST) community, who refused to accept food prepared by the SC (Dalit) woman. News reports noted that families withdrew children from the centre because they did not want them to consume food prepared by a Dalit woman. At first glance, the incident may appear to concern disagreement over employment or administrative decisions. Yet the resistance emerged specifically around cooking and feeding. This distinction matters because it shifts attention from employment alone to the social meaning attached to food, care, and who is considered acceptable to provide them.
The incident raises a deeper question: who is permitted not only to work but to feed, care, and occupy positions of public trust? When refusal appears through food prepared by a Dalit woman, the issue exceeds individual preference and enters the domain of social recognition. This essay begins from the Anganwadi incident but moves beyond it to examine a broader question: what happens to the language of SC/ST brotherhood when untouchability, food, dignity and social equality enter the relationship?
I argue that the persistence of exclusion cannot be understood only through individual prejudice or isolated acts of discrimination. Instead, it reveals how equality often remains conditional and how everyday social practices continue to shape whose labour is valued, whose care is recognised, and whose humanity becomes negotiable. The article, therefore, asks not only why a Dalit woman’s appointment became contested but also what such moments reveal about the limits of solidarity, the politics of recognition, and the conditions under which equality becomes socially acceptable.
Food as a Social Boundary: Why Equality Stops at Shared Eating
The boycott over the appointment of a Dalit woman as an Anganwadi cook raises a question that extends beyond a single institution or an isolated event. Why does resistance intensify when food enters the relationship? Food is often treated as ordinary and private, yet social life imbues it with meanings that go far beyond nourishment. Food creates relationships. It establishes belonging, trust, care, intimacy, and recognition. To eat food prepared by another person is not only to consume what they have made but also to accept their presence within a shared social world. For this reason, food-related practices frequently become sites where social boundaries are protected and reproduced.
This helps explain an important contradiction that appears across many contexts. People may accept working together, exchanging labour, sharing neighbourhood space, and maintaining everyday interaction across caste groups. Yet the same relationships can become unstable when eating together or accepting food prepared by a Dalit becomes involved. The boundary does not emerge at the interaction itself but at the point where the interaction begins to imply equality. In many village contexts, food continues to function as a marker of social distance. A Dalit may be accepted in everyday interaction but encounter resistance when entrusted with cooking and feeding others. Refusal to eat food prepared by Dalit communities, therefore, cannot always be understood as personal preference or individual taste. It reflects deeper assumptions about whose touch, labour, and care become socially acceptable.
This contradiction becomes especially visible in public institutions such as schools and Anganwadi centres. These institutions are organised around the principle that all children should receive care without social distinction. Yet opposition to Dalit cook reveals that inclusion itself remains conditional. The conflict is not about cooking as work but about who is considered socially worthy of preparing and serving food. Cooking is recognised as necessary labour, yet it becomes contested when the cook is a Dalit woman. She may care for children, but faces resistance when publicly recognised as a cook or caregiver.
There is a deeper violence in this contradiction. When a Dalit woman cooks for children, and her food is rejected, the refusal is not directed solely at the meal. It denies her capacity to care, nurture, and participate as an equal human being in the social world. Caste, therefore, regulates not only food but also whose care is deemed socially legitimate, even in government places. Untouchability survives not through separation but through selective inclusion. A Dalit can be appointed, but not to cook. Relationships remain acceptable as long as historically established boundaries are not crossed. Once food begins to signify equality, inherited hierarchies reappear. The question, then, is not why people refuse food. The deeper question is what becomes threatened when shared eating begins to signify social equality.
Beyond MADA: When Development Meets Untouchability
The boycott of the Anganwadi centre following the appointment of a Dalit woman raises a question about the relationship between development policy and everyday caste practice. If the appointment was made in a MADA (Modified Area Development Approach) area, questions of eligibility and policy implementation are legitimate. MADA was introduced to address historical inequalities in education, employment, infrastructure, and welfare among tribal communities. However, administrative eligibility and untouchability are not the same issue. If the concern was only about eligibility under the MADA scheme, why did the protest emerge through the refusal to accept food prepared by a Dalit woman?
The sequence of events is revealing. Initial reports and statements from members of the local ST community made their objection explicit: they opposed the appointment because the Anganwadi cook was a Ganda (SC) woman and stated that, according to their custom, they would not eat food prepared by a Dalit. Villagers withdrew their children from the Anganwadi and demanded that she be replaced. Only after police intervention, media scrutiny, and public criticism did the focus shift to whether her appointment complied with MADA provisions. It suggests that the initial conflict centred on caste and untouchability, while MADA later became the administrative language through which the boycott was justified. The central issue was not simply policy eligibility but the refusal to recognise a Dalit woman’s right to cook and care in a public institution.
This sequence also raises questions about the role of government institutions. Appointing a Dalit woman to a public position is an important step, but recruitment alone cannot ensure equality. The state also has a constitutional responsibility to protect Dalits’ right to work with dignity and free from caste-based discrimination. However, when administrative responses focus more on addressing the objections of those practising caste exclusion than on protecting the rights of the Dalit woman facing untouchability, the state risks reproducing rather than challenging caste inequality. Equality cannot end with an appointment. It requires government institutions to ensure that constitutional guarantees are upheld in practice and that public employees can perform their duties without caste and gender-based discrimination.
The consequences of such actions should also be taken seriously. A caste-based boycott is not merely a form of protest or public disagreement. It inflicts humiliation, psychological trauma, social isolation, and the denial of dignity. In this case, the boycott did not simply target an appointment; it targeted a Dalit woman who had been selected through a government process. Who takes responsibility for the harm caused by such caste-based exclusion? Is it only those who organised the boycott, or do government institutions also bear responsibility when they fail to protect the constitutional rights and dignity of the person who was targeted? Restoring administrative order alone is not enough. Justice also requires recognising and addressing the harm caused by untouchability.
The case also reveals a broader contradiction within development policy. MADA recognises that many tribal communities experience structural disadvantage and therefore require targeted state support. Yet developmental marginalisation does not automatically eliminate social power in everyday life. Communities may experience exclusion within state structures while still exercising authority in local social relations. The ability to collectively shut down an Anganwadi centre and challenge the appointment of a Dalit woman demonstrates that developmental disadvantage and social power do not always operate in the same way.
This is not an argument against MADA or tribal development. Rather, this case demonstrates that development policies alone cannot dismantle caste. Even within a development programme designed to address one form of marginalisation, practices of untouchability can continue to shape everyday social relations. The appointment of a Dalit woman in a public institution became contested not only through questions of policy but through caste-based ideas about who could cook, care for children, and occupy a position of public trust. Policy can address developmental inequalities, but it cannot by itself transform the social hierarchies that determine whose labour, care, and dignity are recognised as equal.
Conditional Brotherhood: Equality and the Limits of Recognition
The refusal to eat food prepared by a Dalit woman reveals a larger pattern in how caste operates in everyday life. The issue is not always complete rejection or social separation. Instead, acceptance often remains conditional. Communities may live together, exchange labour, maintain neighbourly relations, and depend on one another in everyday life. Yet these relationships remain stable only as long as historically unequal social boundaries are not challenged.
Since childhood, I have often heard the phrase that SC and ST (Dom and Kanda) are bhai bhai (brothers), connected through shared experiences of marginalisation, village life, and everyday coexistence. This language of brotherhood carries political and emotional significance. It evokes solidarity, collective survival, and mutual support among communities that have themselves experienced exclusion. Yet my own experiences have repeatedly led me to ask: what happens to brotherhood when equality enters the relationship?
I use the term conditional brotherhood to describe a form of solidarity that allows coexistence but limits equality. Communities may work together, exchange labour, and support one another, but these relationships become fragile when historically excluded communities move beyond service to claim equal dignity, recognition, and public trust. Brotherhood, therefore, is not rejected outright; it is accepted only within the boundaries of inherited social hierarchies. This contradiction appears in everyday life. A SC person may be accepted in work and social interaction, but encounter resistance when seeking equal recognition and dignity. Inclusion remains acceptable until it begins to challenge caste boundaries.
This contradiction is also reflected in my own village experiences. There have been moments when some ST and OBC families approached our household for labour support and, at times, financial assistance during periods of difficulty. These interactions reflected closeness, cooperation, and mutual dependence. Yet despite accepting our labour and support, they would not always eat food in our house. This experience remained with me because it revealed that dependence does not automatically produce equal recognition. Dalit labour became acceptable, but Dalit dignity remained conditional.
This does not mean that every relationship is based on domination or that hierarchy exists in the same way everywhere. However, shared experiences of marginalisation do not automatically create equal relationships. Brotherhood becomes conditional when one community continues to define the limits of another’s equality. Conditional brotherhood means that solidarity lasts only as long as caste boundaries remain unchallenged. When a Dalit woman is appointed to cook in a school or an Anganwadi centre, she crosses a caste boundary by occupying a position of public trust and care. In many contexts, this is precisely where resistance emerges from sections of ST, OBC, and dominant caste communities. The issue is not cooking itself but the equal recognition of the Dalit woman who cooks. The question, then, is not whether communities live together or call themselves brothers. The question is: what kind of brotherhood survives only until equality begins?
One explanation often offered is that some Adivasi communities have, over time, adopted practices associated with the Hindu caste order through long interaction with dominant caste society, a process often described as Sanskritisation. Such historical processes may help explain how ideas of purity, pollution, and untouchability entered some local contexts. However, explanation should not become justification. Historical influence cannot excuse the continued practice of untouchability or the humiliation of Dalit communities. Nor should Dalit be expected to bear the consequences of these historical processes in the name of SC/ST brotherhood. Dalit are not responsible for the historical transformation of some tribal communities, nor should they be asked to tolerate caste discrimination for the sake of maintaining solidarity. If the SC/ST brotherhood requires Dalit to endure humiliation while others continue to practise untouchability, then that brotherhood demands sacrifice from only one side. It is not solidarity but unequal coexistence or slavey.
Dalit Women, Care Labour, and the Burden of Equality
The contradictions discussed so far become sharper when viewed through the experiences of Dalit women. Questions of food, dignity, and social acceptance are not experienced in gender-neutral ways. In many villages, women sustain everyday life through fetching water, preparing food, caring for children, and maintaining households and community relationships. Yet the value attached to care often depends on who performs it. Dalit women frequently occupy positions where their labour is necessary, but their dignity remains conditional. The Anganwadi case illustrates this contradiction. It shows that the burden of caste falls not only on Dalit communities in general but particularly on Dalit women, whose everyday work is centred on cooking, caring, and sustaining life. Their labour is expected, but their equal recognition is often resisted.
The burden of maintaining relationships also falls disproportionately on Dalit women. They are expected to continue caring, continue adjusting, and continue preserving social harmony even when they experience humiliation and exclusion. The responsibility for keeping communities together is placed on those whose equality continues to be questioned. This raises a deeper ethical and political question: why are Dalit women expected to bear the burden of maintaining harmony while others continue to define the limits of their dignity? Why must those who experience humiliation also carry the responsibility of preserving social relationships? The issue, therefore, is not whether Dalit women care for others. The issue is whether society is willing to recognise that care as equal. As long as Dalit women’s labour is accepted but their humanity remains conditional, caste continues to shape not only work but also the ethics of care itself.
Conclusion
What Kind of Brotherhood Survives Equality?
This essay began with the boycott of an Anganwadi centre following the appointment of a Dalit woman as helper-cum-cook. Yet the incident revealed something larger than a disagreement over employment or administration. It exposed how food, care, and public recognition continue to remain unequal social spaces. The argument of this essay is not that solidarity between communities does not exist, nor that all relationships are defined by hierarchy. Rather, it suggests that coexistence should not automatically be confused with equality. Relationships may appear close through labour exchange, everyday interaction, and mutual dependence, but these relationships become more difficult when historically excluded communities move from participation to equal recognition.
The incident also reveals the limits of development and inclusion when everyday practices continue to organise dignity through caste. Employment may become possible while social acceptance remains incomplete. A person may receive a position but still encounter rejection when their labour enters spaces associated with food, care, and public trust.
This contradiction becomes especially visible in the experiences of Dalit women. When a Dalit woman cooks for children, and her food is rejected, the refusal is not directed only at the meal. Caste denies humanity when Dalit women cook for children and share care. The rejection extends beyond food and enters the question of who is recognised as capable of nurturing, caring, and participating as an equal human being in social life. This leaves behind a difficult ethical and political question: if communities boycott one another in the name of caste, can they still claim the language of brotherhood and solidarity? Brotherhood cannot mean accepting labour while refusing equal humanity. Solidarity cannot survive only when social boundaries remain untouched. The question, therefore, is not whether communities can live together. The question is: what kind of brotherhood survives once equality begins?
💙
I read your article and found it genuinely thought-provoking. What impressed me most was your concept of ” *Conditional Brotherhood* .” It is a novel and intellectually engaging idea. Rather than simply describing the Anganwadi incident, you use it to develop a broader sociological and historical argument about equality, dignity, and the limits of solidarity.
I also appreciated that you did not treat the incident merely as a news event or an administrative dispute. Instead, you connected it to larger questions of food, untouchability, dignity, care, the role of the state, and SC ST relations. This gives the article a much wider analytical scope and makes it more than just a commentary on a single incident.
Thank you so much for writing on such an important and much-needed issue💙
Very sensitive issue.probably divide and rule policy has been adopted
Thank you so much Dr. Swati for such a powerful and well explained contribution💙
My sincere gratitude to Sangeeta Nag, Priyanka, and Ratnakar Bemal Sir for taking the time to read and engage with this article. Your insights and encouragement are greatly appreciated.
Thank you so much.
I have been playing online for quite some time and this platform stands out for its genuine fairness and quick support. The bonus structure is easy to understand and never feels forced. I appreciate the calm interface that lets the games speak for themselves. If you want a stress free gaming environment with consistent rewards give it a proper look. pkgoldbet
As a regular player I really appreciate how fast the withdrawals are here. The VIP tier rewards stack up nicely and the dedicated account manager actually cares about my feedback. Local payment options make depositing a breeze. Stop by 616jilivip
Wow this place actually delivers what they promise. The game selection is huge and I found some hidden gems I have never seen elsewhere. The login process is quick and I feel safe while playing. Highly suggest it. mxbettycasino
This is exactly what the Nigerian betting community has been waiting for. Quick transactions honest odds and a platform that actually listens to feedback. You need to check nairabetshop before you spend your money anywhere else nairabetshop
As someone who values regulatory compliance I feel completely safe knowing this site operates under strict MGA standards. The high limit tables are perfectly set up for bigger stakes and the game providers maintain genuine randomness across all sessions. Reliable payouts and a genuinely human support team make this my preferred choice. Sign up at mxbetmgmcasino and join the winning crowd
I have been watching matches and placing my picks for years and this platform finally matches the intensity of the games themselves. The live feed is crystal clear and the in play odds update instantly without any annoying lag. What I love most is how quick they are with promotions and how they always keep the banking options updated for our region. It is rare to find a sportsbook that actually listens to its users so I am staying right here for the long run. xonbet
Sup dudes! Easy a55gamedownload process, I gotta say. No hassle, straight to the action. Check it out yourself: a55gamedownload
Easy access is all I need. This lodi291app delivers, pretty simple to understand the instructions. Wanna try for yourself? Go to lodi291app
5567plataforma has some sweet promos running right now. If you’re looking for a new spot to play, I’d hit them up. Check it out at 5567plataforma.
Finding a convenient way to top up my account was always a hassle until I stumbled on this service. Everything works smoothly and I never worry about my transactions being tracked or delayed. The whole setup feels secure and carefully managed from the first click to the last. teletrakrecarga
Picking this site felt like discovering a hidden gem in a cozy corner of a casino. The games are so vibrant and the vibes are always on point. I really enjoy how easy it is to dive right in and start spinning without any weird interruptions. maxgamingslot
This site brings such a fun vibe to the table. The game selection keeps me coming back and the payout speed is honestly impressive. You can tell they really care about their players. A must visit for anyone chasing a good time online. papigamescasino
I wanted a reliable place to relax and this site delivers exactly that. The game library is massive yet perfectly organized and the payment methods cover everything I need. It feels like they put real thought into making every visit enjoyable and hassle free. Head over to casinoonlinebet30
Finding a reliable spot on the mobile can be such a pain but this one clicks perfectly. I love how the app responds without lag even during peak hours. The daily check in rewards keep me coming back and the staff really treats players like family. Truly a gem for casual gamers who want real fun. Drop by and see for yourself 689slotmm
The name might sound playful but the gameplay is anything but. I enjoy how it balances luck with strategy and keeps the matches lively. My group chat is always buzzing about our latest wins here. Drop in at funnyexchangegame
Been chasing the daily bonuses here and the payouts are honestly amazing. The app loads in seconds and I never had any trouble cashing out my winnings. If you want a stress free gaming session just give this one a try. aw33gamelogin
Navigating the online betting world requires a platform you can genuinely trust and this one delivers exactly that. I enjoy the straightforward layout and the fact that all my transactions are handled with complete security. It has quickly become my go to spot for daily fun. Take a look at pkperabet
Playing from the Philippines has never been this convenient since the mobile version loads instantly on local networks. The deposit methods match what we use here and winnings come through without hidden fees. Highly recommend for anyone looking for a trustworthy local option. phnn777ph
Really impressed with the customer support and how fast the transactions are processed. Everything is professional and transparent. Love bdcpc88!
The app version is way more convenient than the browser. I can play anywhere and the connection is stable. Love using bd89bdapp on my phone.
The app version is a total game changer. So much easier to navigate on my phone than the web version. Grab the app at k777bdapk now.
Really impressed with the service here. The rewards are generous and the community vibe is great. If you are looking for a top notch spot, check out istanaimpian1.
Really liking the variety of games here. Everything feels fresh and the customer support is top notch. Give rosohokilogin a try for sure.
Such a vibe here. The bonuses are actually fair and the rewards keep me coming back every day. You can’t go wrong with idole99.
Best login portal I have used for this game. No more broken links or downtime, just straight to the fun at luckyplayphlogin.
Great community and even better rewards. It feels like a place where players are actually valued. Cheers to brmm33!
The app version is way more convenient than the browser. Everything is just a tap away and the graphics are top notch. jili368app
The Gcash integration is seamless and the login is very secure. It makes managing my funds and playing so much easier. Cheers to nustaronlinegcashlogin for the great service.
This is hands down the number one platform for me. Everything from the deposits to the gameplay is top notch. Visit phno1jili and see for yourself.
Finally a site that doesn’t crash during the big games. The login process is quick and the support team is very helpful. misteribet77login is my new go-to spot.
I’ve tried a few sites but this one is really smooth. The graphics are great and the payouts feel fair. Highly recommend phjiligems for anyone looking for some fun.
The login process is super quick and hassle-free. I appreciate the security measures they have in place, it makes me feel safe while playing. Love it here at loginkratonbet
Such a fun platform with plenty of options to keep you entertained. I spend most of my free time on yoyogame777
Found this spot through a friend and it has been a blast. The interface is clean and the bonuses actually make sense without crazy restrictions. I feel like I am getting real value here every single time. Join me at playhitclub
Finally found a site that actually works without any lag. Had a huge win last night! Visit bdfp777 and try your luck.
Best experience I’ve had in a long time. Everything from the login to the gameplay is just seamless. Check out phjljl5577 if you want a quality game.
Finally found a site where the bonuses actually feel fair. Had a great run on the slots last night! Definitely checking out ug234slot again this weekend.
Signing up was super quick and I loved how easy everything felt from the very first login. The game selection keeps me entertained for hours and the bonuses actually make a difference. Feels like a home away from home for casual gamers. Definitely give it a try when you need a fun escape. cina788login
I felt lucky the moment I joined. The odds are great and the community is very welcoming. Definitely my new favorite spot pkluckybet7
The app version is just fantastic. I can play anywhere and the graphics are crisp. Definitely the best way to access vnhitclubapp on the go.
Super easy to navigate and the registration process was a breeze. Really happy with the service at xgjililogin